TRANSHUMANIZAM I NEURO-DIGITALNE NADOGRADNJE U OBRAZOVANJU

Sara Ovuka; Milica Vekić

doi:10.58898/famedia.v1.10

Authors

Sara Ovuka Faculty of Management, University Union - Nikola Tesla https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5720-4892
Milica Vekić Faculty of Management, University Union - Nikola Tesla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58898/famedia.v1.10

Keywords:

neurotehnologija, interfejs mozak-računar (BCI), neuro-digitalne nadogradnje, obrazovanje, ranshumanizam, neuralna augmentacija, neuroetika

Abstract

Razvoj savremenih neurotehnologija, sa fokusom na interfejse mozak-računar (BCI), otvara nove mogućnosti za primenu u obrazovanju. Cilj ovog rada je ispitivanje potencijalnih implikacija integracije neuro-digitalnih nadogradnji u procese učenja. Primenjen je kvalitativni pristup zasnovan na sistematskom pregledu literature (SLR) u skladu sa PRISMA smernicama. Rezultati ukazuju na to da neuro-digitalne nadogradnje nude kognitivne potencijale u vidu unapređenja memorijskih kapaciteta, efikasnije obrade informacija i razvoja visoko personalizovanih obrazovnih okruženja. Nasuprot tome, identifikovani su i brojni etički i društveni rizici, prvenstveno u domenu zaštite neuralne privatnosti, kognitivne autonomije i mogućeg društvenog raslojavanja. Na osnovu identifikovanih obrazaca, u radu je razvijen konceptualni model neuro-digitalnog obrazovanja koji obuhvata četiri nivoa: neuralnu augmentaciju, kognitivnu akceleraciju, adaptivni inteligentni obrazovni sistem i neuro-etičko upravljanje. Predloženi model pruža teorijski okvir za razumevanje potencijalnih pravaca razvoja obrazovanja u uslovima integracije bioloških i digitalnih sistema. Zaključuje se da primena ovih tehnologija zahteva razvoj interdisciplinarnih regulatornih okvira, dok buduća istraživanja treba usmeriti na empirijsko testiranje predloženog modela.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andhika, A., Aldila, A. S., Supriyono, L. A., Previana, C. N., & Habibie, D. R. (2024). The Effectiveness of Adaptive Learning Systems Integrated with LMS in Higher Education. Jurnal KomtekInfo, 11(2), 49-56.

Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.

Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30(Supplement), 3-14.

Bowers, J. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(5), 600-612.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Carroll, M. (2024, August 30). UK's first 'teacherless' AI classroom set to open in London. Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/uks-first-teacherless-ai-classroom-set-to-open-in-london-13200637

Cinel, C. C., Valeriani, D., & Poli, R. (2019). Neurotechnologies for human cognitive augmentation: current state of the art and future prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 13.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage publications.

Dresler, M., Sandberg, A., Bublitz, C., Ohla, K., Trenado, C., Mroczko-Wąsowicz, A., ... & Surjo, D. (2019). Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 10(3), 1137-1148.

Gordon, E. C. (2022). Cognitive enhancement and authenticity: moving beyond the impasse. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(2), 281-288.

Grinschgl, S., Ninaus, M., Wood, G., & Neubauer, A. C. (2025). To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective. Physics of Life Reviews, 54, 58-77.

Hao, K. (2019, August 2). China has started a grand experiment in AI education. It could reshape how the world learns. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/08/02/131198/china-squirrel-has-started-a-grand-experiment-in-ai-education-it-could-reshape-how-the/

Ienca, M. (2021). On neurorights. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 701258.

Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13(1), 5.

Kass, L. R. (2003). Ageless bodies, happy souls: biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection. The New Atlantis, 1, 9-28.

Krell, J., Dolecki, P. K., & Anderson, T. (2023). School-based neurofeedback training for sustained attention. Journal of Attention Disorders, 27(10), 1117–1128.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.

Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man–computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1, 4–11.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. U M. More & N. Vita-More (Ur.), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future (str. 3-17). Wiley-Blackwell.

Musk, E., & Neuralink. (2019). An integrated brain–machine interface platform with thousands of channels. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e16194.

Peters, M. A. (2011). Transhumanism and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 425-427.

Porter, A. C. (2023). Transhumanism and posthumanism(s) on education. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 31(4), 475–500.

Reardon, S. (2016). 'Brain doping' may improve athletes' performance. Nature, 536(7616), 259-260.

Shamlian, J. (2025, October 2). Inside the $40,000 a year school where AI shapes every lesson, without teachers. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alpha-school-artificial-intelligence/

Sigman, M., Peña, M., Goldin, A. P., & Ribeiro, S. (2014). Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 497-502.

Stanney, K. M., Schmorrow, D. D., Johnston, M., Fuchs, S., Jones, D., Hale, K. S., ... & Young, P. (2009). Augmented Cognition: An Overview. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5(1), 195-224.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292.

Tan, L. Y., Hu, S., Yeo, D. J., & Cheong, K. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence-enabled adaptive learning platforms: a review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100429.

The Guardian. (2019, November 1). Chinese primary school halts trial of device that monitors pupils' brainwaves. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/01/chinese-primary-school-halts-trial-of-device-that-monitors-pupils-brainwaves

The Wall Street Journal. (2019, September 5). How China Is Using Artificial Intelligence in Classrooms [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMLsHI8aV0g

UNESCO. (2021). Report of the IBC on the Ethical Issues of Neurotechnology. International Bioethics Committee (IBC).

Violante, I. R., & Okyere, P. (2024). Can neurotechnology revolutionize cognitive enhancement? PLoS Biology, 22(10), e3002831.

Wexler, A. (2017). The social context of "do-it-yourself" brain stimulation: neurohackers, biohackers, and lifehackers. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(24), 5844-5847.

Yuste, R., Goering, S., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., Fins, J. J., ... & Wolpaw, J. R. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159-163.