GENERATIVE AI AND THE FUTURE OF AUTHORSHIP: MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ART AS A METHOD FOR PRESERVING HUMAN SUBJECTIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58898/famedia.v1.3

Keywords:

generative AI, human subjectivity, modern and contemporary art, cognitive flexibility, media education, meaning-making

Abstract

This article examines the transformation of the author’s role within a digital media environment saturated with generative content and algorithmically mediated communication. In the context of the rapid expansion of synthetic texts, images, and audiovisual materials, the central problem is increasingly defined by an erosion of authorial subjectivity, interpretive depth, and the capacity to produce new structures of meaning. The article proposes the concept of the author as an architect of meaning – a new role model for the contemporary media producer who uses generative AI not as a substitute for the creative act, but as an infrastructural tool for automating routine processes and freeing cognitive resources for interpretation, critical thinking, and meaning-making. The theoretical foundation of the article is an original interdisciplinary methodology grounded in the use of modern and contemporary art as a framework for cultivating cognitive flexibility, divergent thinking, and the capacity to work with uncertainty. Its practical dimension draws on the author’s professional experience in designing educational and media formats, working with small learning communities, and integrating tailored AI workflows into research and editorial practice. The article argues that the sustainable media ecology of the future will be shaped not by the endless production of content, but by the author’s ability to construct distinctive structures of meaning and forms of sustained intellectual presence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press.

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Mitchell, M. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. Penguin Books.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Perigee Books. (Original work published 1934)

Edelman. (2025). 2025 Edelman trust barometer: Trust and the crisis of grievance. Edelman.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.

Gazzaley, A., & Rosen, L. D. (2016). The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world. MIT Press.

Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols (2nd ed.). Hackett. (Original work published 1968)

Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105–2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903038974

Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Portfolio.

Pepperell, R. (2015). Artworks as dichotomous objects: Implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295

Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R., & Gal, Y. (2023). The curse of recursion: Training on generated data makes models forget. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.17493

Tishman, S. (2018). Slow looking: The art and practice of learning through observation. Routledge.

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210

Wang, Y., & King, R. D. (2024). Extrapolation is not the same as interpolation. Machine Learning, 113, 8205–8232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-024-06591-2

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

GENERATIVE AI AND THE FUTURE OF AUTHORSHIP: MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ART AS A METHOD FOR PRESERVING HUMAN SUBJECTIVITY. (2026). Social Informatics Journal, 5(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.58898/famedia.v1.3

Similar Articles

21-30 of 53

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.