Media and Visual Culture through the Paradigms of Modernism(s): from Modernism through Postmodernism to Post-postmodernism and Hypermodernism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58898/sij.v4i2.54-72Keywords:
postmodernism, hypermodernism, culture, paradigm, discourse, fragmentationAbstract
Departing from the premise that postmodernism does not disappear in the course of the historical demise of cultural–epistemological paradigms but is instead transversally incorporated into a new metanarrative of techno-aesthetic hypermodernity, this paper reconfigures the categorical foundations for the analysis of visual and media culture within the context of the post-postmodern transition. Its central thesis does not imply either a regressive reaffirmation of modernist formalism or a normative repair of postmodern fragmentation, but rather the articulation of an epistemologically expanded field within which postmodern poetics—including the simulacral, intertextual, pastiche-based, spectacular, and rhizomatic—are refunctionalized as the techno-ontological infrastructure of a new visual regime. Relying methodologically on heterogeneous yet compatible conceptual modules (assemblage / visual code / cyberspace / algorithmic affectivity), the authors approach media culture not as a phenomenological epiphenomenon, but as an apparatus-based formation of subjectivity in which the aesthetic, the political, and the technological are not separated, but operationalized through modes of digitally mediated (self-)representation. Within this discursive framework, the postmodern no longer exists as a historically “past” concept, but as a semiotic code undergoing algorithmic mutation—reconfigured within a hypermodern environment in which visuality has become the primary mode of affective and cognitive articulation of reality.
Downloads
References
Best, S., and Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. Macmillan Education.
Butler S. C. (2002). Post-Modernism: A Very Shot Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. University of Minnesota Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity.: Continuum.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
Kember, S., and Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge. MIT Press
Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage
Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism (2nd Edition). Sage.
Kellner, D. (1989). Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond. Stanford University Press.
Kirby, A. (2009). Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. Contin-uum.
Liotar, Ž. F. (2024). Postmoderno stanje: Izveštaj o znanju. Karpos.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) [1979] The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota.
Vermeulen, T., and Akker, R. van den (2010). Notes on Metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2, 1–14.
Pakulski, J., Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society. SAGE.
Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiery into the Origins of Cultural Change. Blackwell.
Thiele, L. P. (2002). Thinking Politics: Perspectives in Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern Political Theory. Seven Bridges Press.
White, K. S. (1991) Political Theory and Postmodernism (Modern European Philosophy). Cambridge University Press.
Pignagoli, V. (2003). Post – Postmodernist Fiction and the Rise of Digital Epitexts. The Ohio State University Press.
Hutcheon, L. (2003). The Politics of Postmodernism. Routledge.




