SCIENCE, ETHICS AND NEW EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

Authors

  • Dr. Momcilo Bajac Faculty of management, University UNION Nikola Tesla, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-6373
  • Mr. Mirjana Fiser Faculty of management, University UNION Nikola Tesla, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58898/sij.v3i2.15-22

Keywords:

philosophy, society, ethical capacity, responsibility, nanotechnology,, coalition, collaboration, multidisciplinary.

Abstract

In this paper, we will examine the relationship between science, ethics, and emerging technologies, with a particular focus on nanoscience and nanotechnology. Our goal is to demonstrate that all sciences, including these most recent ones, originate from philosophy, which has always strived to maintain an integral, holistic approach to reality. In contrast to philosophy, individual sciences gradually lose interest in philosophical views of a higher level of generality and a holistic approach to reality. As a result, sciences often neglect ethics and value judgments that assess the consequences of their activities and outcomes. Nanotechnology, along with other convergent technologies such as biotechnology, information technology, artificial intelligence, and neurotechnology, differs from other technologies in its ability to operate at the atomic and molecular levels. This enables its impact on the natural environment and the human organism to often remain beyond public awareness. Such a situation raises legitimate concerns and calls for addressing the issue of responsibility for the development of these technologies. Strict and organized action by the broadest possible public is needed to ensure the responsible development and application of nanotechnology. In this paper, we will consider potential coalitions for overseeing these technologies, as well as some key questions that must be answered before these technologies "slip" beyond our control. In this context, special attention will be given to promoting a multidisciplinary approach and involving various stakeholders from the fields of science, philosophy, ethics, and representatives of civil society in the decision-making processes related to the development and regulation of nanotechnology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bayda, S., Adeel, M., Tuccinardi, t., Cordani, M., Rizzolio, (2019). The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical–Physical Applications to Nanomedicine. doi: 10.3390/molecules25010112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6982820/pdf/molecules-25-00112.pdf

Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2010). Opening the Field of Nanoethics: Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue on Bionanoethics, II. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 16 (1), 1-2. https://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/16-1/editorial_bensaude.pdf

José Manuel de Cózar-Escalante (2021). Representation as a matter of agency: a reflection on nanotechnological innovations, University of La Laguna, Spain. https://relans.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/representation-as-a-matter-of-agency.pdf

Krawford K. (2021) Atlas of AI,Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, Yale University Press.

https://www.essra.org.cn/upload/202105/The%20Atlas%20of%20AI%20Power,%20Politics,%20and%20the%20Planetary%20Costs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence.pdf

Leonhar Gerd, (2016) TECHNOLOGY vs. HUMANITY The coming clash between man and machine Gerd Leonhard, The Futures Agency, Zurich, Switzerland

technology-vs-humanity-the-coming-clash-between-man-and-machine-futurescapes-1nbsped-0993295827-9780993295829_compress.pdf

Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira and José António Filipe (2022). ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON NANOTECHNOLOGY, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.01063 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.01063

Ronald Sandler (2009). Nanotechnology, the social and ethical issues, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/phg/content_level_pages/reports/nanofinalpdf.pdf

Schwab,K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Worl Economic Forum. Dostupno na https://law.unimelb.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf, pristupljeno: 15.12.2024.

Shannon L. Spruit1 • Gordon D. Hoople2 • David A. Rolfe3 (2016). Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize, Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 22, pages 871–887, (2016) DOI 10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1

Sparrow, R. 2009. The social impacts of nanotechnology: an ethical and political analysis. The Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6(1): 13-23, January.

https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/252775186/1781389_oa.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

SCIENCE, ETHICS AND NEW EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES. (2024). Social Informatics Journal, 3(2), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.58898/sij.v3i2.15-22

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.